« January 2008 | Main | March 2008 »

February 2008

February 24, 2008

Acting my age

By Dale Conour

I am 45 years old.

My 19-year-old son recently gave me a hard time for using "totally" in a sentence, like I was being some old guy trying to act like a cool young guy. I thought about it, and realized I totally use totally all the time, and also have to confess to "jonesing" for sundry items over the past few years, which isn’t exactly the latest phrase to hit pop culture, but definitely didn’t originate in my generation—either the last straggling Boomers or the pioneering Gen Xers, depending on whose definition you use.

It got me thinking about age, about being young versus being old. And if I’m in some kind of denial about getting older? I mean, I am, cliché of clichés, remarried to a younger woman. (I do not, however, have a sports car; in fact, I am totally not even jonesing for a sports car.)

And I’m often told I seem 10 years younger than I am.

I have a 16-year-old son to go with that 19-year-old, and when I tell people this they’re often surprised, and suggest that I hail from some trailer in the backwoods of Virginia. (With apologies to all you backwoods people of Virginia—I’m just, you know, reporting here.) And get this: I’ve been carded several times in ’08.

Wouldn’t all this go to my head?

Let’s dig into this more. There are a few reasons I think people assume I’m younger, one more obvious than the other.

One has to be, of course, that I must look younger—nothing like a shaved head to take care of the gray hairs, and I’ve so far avoided the white sneakers, high-waisted jeans and tucked-in polos that make up the uniform of the dad-of-a-certain-age.

There’s the arrested development factor. I often act, and think, like I’m still 12 and reading comics up in my favorite tree. Truth be told, I am currently writing book two of a script for a three-part "graphic novel" (not a comic book, darn it) and frankly, if I had a tree, I’d be writing it up there.

But the more interesting reason, I think, is my approach to life.

If it’s new I’m interested. My sons and I routinely share new music. I recently spent several minutes explaining to two skeptical women a good deal younger than me what Twitter was, and why it was, well, kinda cool in a tapping-into-the-world-hum kind of way.

So have I set myself up as some poor goofball with a Peter Pan complex?

But look, here’s the funny part: I’m not really a big fan of Youth, and the glorification of it is one cultural Kool-Aid I haven’t downed yet.

Do I miss the physical benefits of being 25? Sometimes, but would I take back that vertical leap and miracle metabolism if it meant I had to be a dumbshit again? Not even tempting. We’re not championing what can be the benefits of aging—maturity, experience, thoughtfulness, wisdom.

Okay, emerson’s trusty generalization alarm is going off, so it’s time to be smart about all this. Really, young and old are relative concepts. I’ve met "young" people who were old, "old" people who were young. I’ve encountered young people sitting around waiting to get old.

Ellen_page I mean, Christ, the Ellen Page-Barbara Walters interview is on the TV in the background right now, and who comes off as the wise, soulful woman with great emotional depth? (And which one has had every last wrinkle magically brushed away in her photo?)

One of my favorite quotes ever is from some really "old" guy who was being interviewed because he was spotted roller skating:

"People tell me I should I act my age; but I don’t even know what that means."

We need to marry the positive energy and the fresh creative look at challenges that youth represents with the mindfulness, centeredness and perspective of experience that age can reward us with.

Let’s embrace the new without ever forgetting that nothing’s ever totally new, and maybe we’ll learn how to allow this world to be the better place it’s meant to be.

Hmmm—am I griping?

Maybe I am getting old...

Let’s stay in touch.

February 13, 2008

Q&A: Ky Anderson

Seev2
On top of the mountain you can see forever #95, 2007, 24"x24", Oil on canvas, by Ky Anderson

By Dale Conour

Artist Ky Anderson dreams of mountains and then paints mountains as dreams. Her work has the weight of something primal and true, calling on the power the mountain has always held over us to create an iconography of the soul. Photographer Ky Anderson, like most of us, sets out to document, but with her artist’€™s eye, can’€™t help capturing those fleeting moments that tell volumes.

Q: In your 20x20o notes about your featured painting there, you wrote:

"Often when I start a painting I like to imagine myself as a traditional landscape painter..."

I read an essay (by Sophie Gee) in the NY Times Books review recently about adaptations of classics into films, and this thought of hers stuck with me: "...the best books always need rewriting, and the best writers know they€’re rewriters."

I wonder how this applies to art, especially to work like yours that re-imagines what a "landscape" painting is?

A: When I say I like to imagine myself as a traditional landscape painter it comes from a very romantic place. I do pull from a history of landscape painting, but I don’t have a lot of landscape painting books around my house I look at. I am pulling more from the activity of being a landscape painter, being on a hillside with really good light and a cool breeze. This is how I put myself in the mindset to paint. I use it as a trigger. It makes me laugh to think of myself looking a hillside very seriously while what actually comes out on the paper is something completely different. It’s a nice place to start from, and so loaded with great history and meaning, not only from an art history place but also from places of great beauty.

I do think that artists constantly remake other pieces of art.  But it is rare to find an artist who admits this. Thinking about it simply, there are two sides to it. One side is that inspiration can come from a similar place, and the other side is that people can be inspired by each other. Both are very different, I find that most artists are very protective about where their inspiration comes from. 

My parents are both artists and this is something they regularly discussed at the dinner table when I was child. (Now that I am older I get in on the discussion) Inspiration to make art, for both of my parents, comes from a similar place, but the final outcome of their work could not be farther apart. They both feel completely original and alone in their inspiration. I think as an artist you have to feel original to validate what you are doing. Its important to grasp the inspiration, own it and feel deep down that it is yours and only yours. If you sat around and thought about the fact you are just remaking art that already exists you might put the brush down and go to business school. On the other hand, there is a part of me that also thinks its important to be aware that you may not alone in your inspiration and appreciate those that came before you and those around you doing similar things.

Q: This leads to something else you wrote:

"My paintings tell stories but by leaving them abstract and simple I challenge the viewer to bring their own story to the work."

The way you use "stories" here doesn’€™t literally mean plots with beginning, middle and end. I’€™d love to hear more thoughts from you about the artist as storyteller, particularly in the context of landscape.

A: I think most artist are storytellers, but in many different ways. Sometimes artists have very elaborate concepts behind their work and sometimes it’s the simplicity that is the story. I am somewhere in between. I do tell stories in my work but your right it does not mean a plot with beginning, middle and end. I want the viewer to be involved and make up their own stories.  In my work I talk more with metaphors for thought, a simple story can talk about much more. For example when I paint a mountain with an object balancing on top of it, the painting is about the balance and struggle of that object and all that it has to deal with when it spends its time only balancing, never falling. It becomes exhausting.  I think in our modern world people can understand how that relates to their life.

The landscape gives the viewer an immediate place. Give it a horizon line and everyone knows where they are. Sometimes if I am feeling unsure about a painting, a simple horizon line can help me know where I am in the painting and it somehow tells me where to go next. As a story teller the communication between artist and viewer is very important. I like to think of the viewer having quiet moments alone with my work, and hopefully my work will cause question and wonder. Of course some people don’€™t get it. I was once trying to explain this all to a collector and they said "€œoh, isn’t that nice and happy". I don’€™t see my paintings as nice and happy. I see a lot of them as pointing out the bad with a touch of optimism.

Two_pointy_mtns
Two pointy mountains, 22'€"x30"€, Acrylic on paper, 2006, by Ky Anderson

Q: Another quote from you:

"To me the mountain image is filled with meaning. It comes from my first memorable dream of falling off the top of a mountain."

Love to hear more about your attraction to mountains, the resonance they have for you.

A:
My first memorable dream started at the base of a mountain, my father and I were getting into our old truck. I had really long arms, so long that my hands flapped out the windows on both sides like wings. This mountain had a road that wound all the way around it like a spiral, as we started to drive up it the weather got worse and worse. Light snow, then ice and then full on blizzard at the top. The roads were very slippery but it was calm and peaceful in the truck. We were almost to the top and our truck started to slip on the ice, we slipped of the mountain and started to free-fall to the bottom.  We crashed and I died. I floated up out of my body and saw the wreckage and our broken bodies, then everything went gray. I was about 5 or 6 when I had this dream. This was my first dream of dying, and since then I have one or two a year. I don’€™t know or really care about the psychology behind it all, but I find that I keep making art about it. It pretty wild to see yourself dead in a dream, it resonates with me for weeks after.

Something stuck with me when I had that dream, even when I painted as a child I painted mountains. It’s a bit compulsive. When ever I get really into the mood from painting, I think the same simple thought, "€œman, that painting would be great with a mountain in it"€ then I paint the mountain, and it feels really good, very satisfying, like really good sex. Then I sit back and think, "€œoh man, I painted that damn mountain again! What is wrong with me!?"  Sometimes the whole thing feels ridiculous. But then I remind myself that I am probably not the only artist out there to be compulsive and repeat themselves.

Yellow_mtn
Yellow Mountain, Blue Circle, 22" €x30"€, Acrylic on Paper, 2006, by Ky Anderson


Ce2mashpotatomtnQ: ..And I wonder how viewing Close Encounters, with the main character’€™s obsession with Devils Tower, impacted you... ; )

A: Actually when I first saw that movie it made me really uncomfortable, because I was already aware of my compulsion. I thought, just as long as I don’t start making mountains with my mashed potatoes everything will be okay!  It was pretty funny.


Viewing_the_mtns
Viewing the mountains, 2007, 22"x22", Oil on canvas, by Ky Anderson

Q: How is your approach to photography different than your approach to painting. How is it the same?

A: Sometimes I pull from similar themes that are in my paintings, but mostly I just shoot. I take pictures and then pull out the series later. Its great to see the series emerge from a pile of photos taken over the years. I love to document, and for me that is an instinct that comes from a sentimental place. 

I have one series that emerged from my photographs after more than 10 years. Without realizing for years I had been taking photos of my friends when we went out to eat.  I ended up with a really large series of pictures of my friends eating or looking at the menu or getting irritated with me for taking pictures of them. It’s a great series, it shows time in a wonderfully simple way. It shows people coming in and out of my life, and the life long friends shine. Once I noticed the series I became too self conscious to take those photos anymore, and when I tried to take the photos they felt forced. So I learned that I don’€™t like to push anything when it comes to my photography. My favorite photos are spontaneous. I suppose my painting is the same, the spontaneous paintings are some of my favorites.

Jaime
Jaime, 1995, by Ky Anderson

Q: What’s your favorite way to get a nature hit?

A: Gardening! Oh man, in the spring it takes over my life! I try to grow and can food to eat all year. I have a huge garden that is sometimes more than I can handle. I don’t know if most people would call that a nature hit, but I think it is. I love being outside all day and being completely covered in dirt and mud at the end of the day. When the garden catalogs start to show up in the spring I call them my garden porn magazines! I spend hours looking at them and planning my garden.

Swimming in calm rivers and tubing down them is also a favorite pastime.

Q: What’s a perfect world look like to you?

A: Wow that is quite a question. With all the politics in the air lately I have been thinking a lot about promises made by people no different that you or I.  Sure they have more power and money, but they are still people ruled by their moods and emotions, people who make mistakes and regret decisions they have made in the past just like everyone else. One minute we think one horrible thing like lets bomb them, then the next we are ready to say we are sorry. How can we possibly have a perfect world when people are so irrational, and everyone has an entirely different view on how the world is supposed to be without any acceptance of the difference. I would like to think that if we all took some time out to really think about our decisions and think about the future the world might benefit. In a perfect world everyone would have compassion, empathy, and openly embrace difference.

Every week I drive over a huge bridge that was built 50 years ago and only designed to last 50 years. An 8 lane bridge over the Hudson river that tens of thousands of drivers rely on every day. Every time I drive over that bridge I think about the person in power who made a financial decision to not build a better bridge, they knew they were leaving a huge problem for future generations but they did it anyways, and nobody stopped them. That is a small example of something that would not happen in my perfect world.

Rodeo_5
Rodeo, 2007, by Ky Anderson

Q: What have you always wanted to be asked as an artist? And what’s the answer?

A: Of all the things to do in this world why do you make art and don’€™t you think its kind of selfish?

I make art because if I don’€™t I turn into a real grump. I make it because it triggers a true joy inside of me that I cannot achieve any other way. In that way it is selfish, but not if you talk to people close to me, they know I am better person to be around after I have had some time in the studio.

I think about the selfish aspect of making art all the time, sometimes I think I should be doing more with my life to have an impact on the greater good. On the other hand, I do believe artists have a very important role in the world. A role to help others see things in different ways, I hope that throughout my life as an artist I can achieve this.

Handing_it_to_me
Handing it to me, 24"€x24"€, Acrylic on Paper, 2008, by Ky Anderson

I have an old family friend who passed away a few years ago, he was also one of my painting teachers at The Kansas City Art Institute. Lester Goldman, he was an incredibly prolific artist, the amount of work he did in his life is enormous. His wife recently put all of work on display and last week I spent several hours looking through hundreds of paintings. Looking at all of his work together and seeing the timeline of his life in his art put making art into a different perspective for me. It made it all feel worth while. His wife and I did a painting trade, so I got one of his great paintings. I hope that after I am gone someone will feel something remotely similar to how excited I feel that I get to live with one of his paintings.

Links: Ky Anderson, Ky Anderson at 20x200, Sophie Gee’s NY Times article

Let’s stay in touch.

February 10, 2008

Gödel, Escher, Bach VI

I’m working my way, day by day, through the Pulitzer Prize-winning classic, "Gödel, Escher, Bach"; it’s one of the seminal books on the search for the "I" within us, and a prodigious work (pray for me). You can find earlier entries below, or collected at right.

By Dale Conour

Curiouser and curiouser becomes the learning as I drop further down the GEB rabbit hole. Hofstadter begins what will be the pattern of the entire book: ping-ponging between "Dialogues," featuring the characters of Achilles and the Tortoise and delving into his concepts through metaphor, and "Chapters," addressing the same concepts through more formal means.

Achilles and the Tortoise were first employed by ancient philosopher Zeno of Elea (he predated Socrates andZeno_of_elea Plato), who used them to illustrate his famed paradoxes, and then resurrected millennia later by Lewis Carroll to show off a paradox of his own (to come later in the book, promises Hofstadter).

Hofstadter retells Zeno’s account of a race between Achilles and the Tortoise in which the philosopher puts forth the following argument: Given a head start and constant, infinite motion, the Tortoise will always stay ahead of the fleeter Achilles if he merely vacates each point in space before Achilles arrives there. After all, Achilles must reach the point where the Tortoise just was before he can then advance to the one where the Tortoise is now.

It’s a variation of Zeno’s "dichotomy paradox" that supports his theorem that Motion is Inherently Impossible (Motion Unexists) because, in traveling from A to B, you have to go halfway first, but first halfway of that, and halfway of that, and so on, to infinity.

Since Zeno managed to get around despite his clever argument, he was really using these paradoxes to show that space and time clearly aren’t segmental, that they are continuous, and therefore, the linear concept of Motion must be a mental, not a physical construct.

Hofstadter’s variation of the race includes A and T remarking on a Zen koan in which two monks argue about a flag. "The flag is moving," says one. "The wind is moving," counters the other. A master happens by, and says they’re both wrong: "Mind is moving."

Is it possible I’m oversimplifying all this? Uh, yeah...

And of course, the author’s version of the tale also has loops. The two characters discuss Zeno’s paradox only to have Zeno show up and encourage them to have the race that they were just conversing about to "empirically" prove the theorem that he’s already used them metaphorically to prove.

And they will be racing toward a distant flag that resembles Escher’s Möbius Strip I—something they both acknowledge can’t really be there because it hasn’t come into existence yet (from their perspective).

What’s it all mean? We’ve covered plenty to chew on already. But the Chapter that follows lays out the underpinnings of a "formal system." Formal systems house theorems (like Zeno’s presumably). Do I understand how the first Dialogue and Chapter completely relate? Not completely yet. But hopefully I’ll be much closer by the next time I report on this...

Hang in there with me: We’re not only chasing the "I," we're attempting to understand a new version of "reality." Nothing like a good brain stretch.

Next time: The puzzle of MU, and the importance of jumping out of the system

Let’s stay in touch.

February 04, 2008

Q&A: Laura Levine

Natalie_snow
Natalie Merchant © Laura Levine


By Dale Conour

You know those bios you read that make you feel like your entire life has been a waste and what’s the point in even starting to try harder now? Laura Levine, filmmaker, rock n roll photographer, animator, artist, author, etc., has done it all, with her work featured everywhere from the New Yorker and Rolling Stone to the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame and Museum to the Museum of International Folk Art in Santa Fe. I recommend reading her bio and converting the inevitable envy into inspiration—Laura’s been livin’.

With her recent forays into natural history, specifically her series of regional bird illustrations (the "Tweet Suite" series), it seemed like a nice time to bring Laura Levine into the fold of the New Romantics (surely a greater honor than the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame, no?)

Q: You wrote recently about your work featured in 20x200: "Lately I’ve found myself focusing more on nature..." How does a subject usually make its way into your work? (If there is a "usually.")

A: It’s never a conscious decision, it just sort of happens. Sometimes the smallest thing can trigger it and off I go. I tend to work mostly in a series format, and I’ll usually choose a subject that fascinates me or strikes some sort of chord, as well as one that I’d like to learn more about. Once I get involved in the subject there’s generally a lot of research involved, and I can become rather obsessed with it.

So, for example, I’ve painted series of portraits of petty criminals of 19th century New York City, actual documented UFO sightings from the Fifties, Old West outlaws and heroes (cowboys, cowgirls), and of course, biographical portraits of musicians (which arose directly from my love of music and my previous career as a music photographer). It’s all documentary reportage or storytelling in a way, what I sometimes call "documentary illustration."

Years ago I picked up a torn old diagram of the Titanic at a yard sale and got a bee in my bonnet about the story (this was well before the Broadway musical and movie). It wasn’t a particularly popular subject at the time, but I dove right in (pun intended), even traveling to visit the Titanic Museum (which turned out to be the back room of Henry’s Jewelry Store in Springfield, Mass.). However, this was a situation where I eventually found the subject matter to be so utterly depressing that I never completed it. And once Titanic mania hit, that was it, I stopped. That was an exception though.

Newbirdsofthecatskillslevine
Birds of the Catskills © Laura Levine

Q: What was the evolution of the "Tweet Suite" series? Any surprise twists and turns or was it just intelligent design all the way?

A: Tweet Suite actually came out of a one-off illustration project. I was asked by Mark Murphy to contribute a page to a calendar project called Artistic Utopia.  I sometimes paint up in the Catskills, and there are several bird feeders outside the window, where I can easily spend hours watching the birds. That was pretty much it, my idea of artistic utopia: painting and watching and being in nature. Up till then I’d mostly painted people or objects, but rarely the natural world.

I made a painting of the birds I saw out the window, called Birds of the Catskills, and it sold right away (to my old friend Laurie David the environmental activist, who’s been collecting my work for awhile now). I so enjoyed doing it, and it seemed to hit a nerve with other people as well, that I decided to continue it as a broader series of common regional birds of the US. I researched other regions of the US (Rockies, New York City, Los Angeles, the Pacific Northwest) and as usual, I really got into it - stacks of field guides, web research, and correspondence with ornithologists (who were incredibly generous with their time and knowledge).

The trading stamp background was kismet as well. I’d picked up several shoeboxes-worth at a yard sale years earlier, and had saved them, patiently waiting for just the right project.

When I take on these subjects, I take them very seriously, and I require that my research be thorough and accurate, a perfectionism which probably owes a lot to my background in photojournalism.

Birds_of_the_pacific
Birds of the Northwest © Laura Levine

Q: Did spending so much time looking at, and thinking about, birds, change the way you see them, experience them?

A: I’ve always been a big animal lover, but I never specifically related to birds until I started this project. I certainly got to know the personalities of my little visitors - the bullying bluejays, the skittish chickadees, the pair of mourning doves who never left each others’ side.

Q: Is there anything about the outdoors that you dream of being able to capture in a painting, or photograph, or even on film, but it remains elusive?

A: It’d be nice to tackle a landscape, but I wouldn’t even know where to start. Having never taken a painting class, and having gotten into the field later in life, I don't really feel I have a handle on that yet. I’m still working on the small subjects. Maybe someday.

Q: Are you at work on anything now with strong "nature" overtones or subjects?

A: Well, I’m continuing with the birds, as they’ve gotten such a great response and I feel like there are so many more species and regions I’d like to explore and learn about. I’ve got a solo show coming up this spring at the Varga Gallery in Woodstock, NY of the bird paintings, so I need to paint a few new ones. I’m also starting to produce prints of some of the bird paintings, which I’m very excited about.

Bjork
Björk © Laura Levine

Q: You’ve accomplished such strong portraiture in your photography, seemingly capturing something true and natural about your subjects, and yet your participation in the process is clear: They’re distinctively your creation. How does that process work (or not work sometimes)?

A: Is my participation really that clear? I try to not impose myself into the photographs, aside from trying to make the subject feel comfortable, be themselves, and hopefully create an intimacy that will then come across in the image. Obviously I have a certain visual style and approach to composition, lighting, mood, etc., but my idea of a successful portrait is one that creates an insight into the subject; it’s not about me.

I often pick up on certain aspects of a person - particularly ones with a very public persona - that aren’t often illuminated, and try to show that more private side of them when I take their portrait. Maybe that’s what you mean -- I create the atmosphere in which the subject is allowed to be themselves, with perhaps a little nudge from me here and there to help bring them out.

Q: There seems to be a strong folk art influence in your illustrative work—how "studied" is that?

A: I came to painting rather late. I was a photographer and already in my late 20s before I picked up a paintbrush and decided to see what might come out, having had no training (art school or otherwise), so in that sense I suppose I am self-taught, and I think that most self-taught (or untrained) artists who come from that place inevitably have - on the surface - a similar sensibility and look to their work: naivete, lack of perspective, bold colors, etc. It's what comes naturally. Believe me, if I could paint "better," I would!

Mikechickenbothnew

Mike the Headless Chicken [click for larger version] © Laura Levine

Q: So, uh, tell me more about Miracle Mike, the headless chicken. Where did that come from? : )

A: Miracle Mike the Headless Chicken is one of the longer narrative pieces I’ve been lucky enough to do for Blab! magazine. Monte Beauchamp, the editor, gives me two pages an issue and lets me run with it. I’ve mostly focused on writing and illustrating stories about real life people and events  - the painterly equivalent of a documentary film, I suppose (another pursuit of mine). In fact, one of the pieces was actually based on a short doc film I’d made. My previous stories were about the Collyer Brothers, Veronica Lake, The Piccolo Midgets, and then there’s Mike. He was quite the celebrity in his time. All of the stories share certain aspects - truth, curiosity, humor, sadness, celebrity, and most of all, obsession.

Links:

Laura Levine’s website

Laura Levine, featured on 20x200

Fantagraphic’s offerings of Blab Magazine

Levine’s making a private run of Scarlet Tanager (limited to an edition of 100) as a gift for friends, family and selected collectors—"But there’ll probably be a few remaining, which will be for sale to the public"

Let’s stay in touch.

emerson noted

One-Mile Island: journal excerpts

Gödel, Escher, Bach: a series

Stay connected

Sites we just love

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

AddThis Social Bookmark Button